Planning advice for contractors

FIDIC is the contract of EU-funded infrastructure, and the 2017 Edition decides extensions of time on the programme and the records behind it, not on the merits. On CEF-funded work those records also have to survive a funding audit. A guide for UK contractors moving into EU work and Baltic teams on funded jobs: what Sub-Clause 8.3 demands, how the 28-day and 84-day claim time bars work, and what an audit-ready FIDIC programme and claim actually contain.

Most contractors prepare NEC programmes for submission. The strongest contractors prepare them for review. The difference is whether the planning team knows what the project manager actually checks, in what order, and what triggers rejection at each step. This article walks through the review sequence as the project manager experiences it: the first thirty seconds, the structural integrity pass, the clause 31.2 information check, the realism test, and the scope compliance che

Primavera P6 is the industry-standard scheduling tool on major UK construction projects. It is also an opinionated one. Its defaults were shaped by contracts that work very differently from NEC, and a P6 schedule built to generic best practice will usually look fine on the surface and fail at the moments that matter most. This is the complete contractor guide to Primavera P6 for NEC programmes.

The programme schedule goes to the planner. The programme narrative goes to the decision-maker. Most contractors write one that describes the Gantt rather than argues the case. Here is why that costs them at clarification and what a strong narrative actually does.

Excel is not a planning tool. It is a calculation tool with planning-shaped output. NEC contracts are built on logic recalculation. The seven recurring pitfalls of Excel programmes on NEC projects are not seven separate problems with seven separate fixes. They are seven symptoms of one structural mismatch between the category of tool and the category of contract. This is the complete analysis: why Excel cannot perform the contractual functions.

NEC did not arrive fully formed. It evolved as a deliberate response to the failures of the contracts that preceded it, and every clause in the current NEC4 suite carries the imprint of a specific problem that JCT and ICE could not solve. The history is not background to contemporary NEC practice. It is the explanation of why the controls matter, what the contract was designed to prevent, and how contractors who understand the evolution administer the contract more effectivel

There was a time when a construction programme could survive as a polite fiction. That time is ending. In modern UK construction, the programme has quietly become the document that reveals whether a contractor is genuinely managing time or simply explaining it after the event. The dividing line is no longer between firms with newer software and firms with older software. It is between firms that maintain a believable live time position and firms that periodically reconstruct

Most construction delivery teams still rely on fragmented spreadsheets, scattered emails and static PDF reports that take hours to compile and rarely tell the full story. The Contractor Performance Dashboard consolidates everything a Project Manager, Planner, QS or Site Manager needs into one coherent view: live SPI tracking, plan-versus-actual S-curves, structured obstacle logs, work-pack variance, four-week lookahead and compensation event evidence.

The UK construction sector has committed to delivering £718 billion of work over the next decade against a labour market that the Construction Industry Training Board projects will need an additional 239,300 workers between 2025 and 2029 just to meet the requirement. Senior NEC planning capability sits inside that shortage. The conventional view of remote planning support positions it as a cost-saving arrangement or a small-contractor accommodation. Both framings understate w