All Posts

Where multiple compensation events arise under NEC4, separate assessment is usually the safer route. This guide explains the accepted programme, the dividing date, and why one blended impact programme can weaken traceability.

Time Risk Allowance vs terminal float in NEC is a distinction contractors need to keep clear. The two are related, but they are not the same thing, and confusing them can weaken programme acceptance, distort update logic and blur compensation event assessments. One of the easiest ways to weaken an NEC programme is to blur the line between Time Risk Allowance and terminal float. They are related, but they are not the same thing. NEC guidance requires the programme to show flo

Clause 15 only works when early warnings trigger decisions and programme movement. Here’s a quantified register method and weekly rhythm you can run on real jobs.

A practical NEC3 vs NEC4 comparison focused on programme acceptance, treated acceptance, early warning discipline and CE integration, based on NEC’s “Next Generation” white paper.

Most NEC4 compensation event advice focuses on Clauses 61 and 62. The bigger commercial risk often appears later, when an NEC4 clause 64 compensation event ends up being valued by the Project Manager rather than by your quotation. That is necessary, but it is not the whole risk. Clause 64 is where many contractors lose margin quietly. The Project Manager decides to assess the CE themselves, often with less time detail, fewer allowances, and a conservative view of cost and tim

On NEC4, many CE disputes are decided by process rather than merit. The NEC4 compensation event time bar is the main risk point, and it is driven by timing and evidence, not how strong your narrative feels. Clauses 61 and 62 control that process. Clause 61 is about getting the CE into the system on time. Clause 62 is about turning it into a priced and time-assessed decision, and stopping it from drifting. This article gives a workflow you can run on live projects with a simpl

No Accepted Programme in place? You can still assess NEC4 compensation events. This practical guide shows the baseline wording, dividing date discipline, and a simple evidence pack that gets decisions.

A contractor playbook for NEC4 Compensation Events: manage the CE clock, use the right programme at the dividing date, and submit a decision pack PMs can accept quickly.

Subcontractor delay becomes the main contractor’s problem on NEC4. Seven pitfalls that weaken your position, and the programme-led controls that keep the narrative, mitigation and evidence defensible.

A practical playbook to score social value marks: pick relevant outcomes, set measurable targets, govern delivery, link to the programme, and evidence what happened.

For contractors, pre-construction planning is not “getting ready to start”. It is building a credible, auditable delivery plan and the control system you will use to manage progress and change.

NEC contracts have become the backbone of UK infrastructure, utility and engineering projects. Whether you are bidding for work in energy, rail, highways, water, industrial facilities or major civils packages, your NEC tender submission is now a core differentiator and the Procurement Act 2023  has raised the bar even higher. Procurement expectations now reward stronger planning evidence and measurable Social Value. Bidders must now demonstrate: robust planning & controls cap

Excel is great for registers and dashboards, but risky as the master NEC programme. Here are 7 pitfalls that undermine cause and effect, plus fixes using a lean logic linked schedule.

NEC Whitepaper: “The History of NEC – Evolving to be the world’s favourite procurement suite” The NEC story is not just “contract history”; it explains why NEC projects succeed or fail in practice. The NEC whitepaper traces the suite from its origins in the late 1980s to the current NEC4 era, highlighting the consistent theme: NEC is designed to stimulate good project management, not merely allocate legal risk after the event. First, NEC is explicit that collaboration is “har

Tender scoring in 2026 is converging on measurable outcomes and delivery proof. Learn what wins in industrial bids and how to package evidence for higher scores.

Construction planning in 2026: how to win and deliver projects successfully Introduction: planning in an age of chronic delay Despite decades of progress in tools and standards, global construction still struggles to deliver projects on time and on budget. Recent systematic reviews show that delays remain endemic across building, infrastructure and industrial projects, with recurring root causes such as design changes, weak planning, poor site management, resource shortages a

A contractor performance dashboard that turns progress meetings into decision sessions: clear KPIs, plan vs actual trends, obstacles, and mitigation—built to satisfy NEC and FIDIC reporting expectations.

Practical Differences for Contractors on Programme, Reporting and Compensation Events For contractors delivering engineering and construction projects in the UK and internationally, the choice between NEC and FIDIC isn’t just a legal technicality – it changes how you plan, report and secure entitlement to time and money. Programme requirements, reporting expectations and the way changes are valued all work differently under each form. If you treat them the same, you increase

Social Value in Practice: How Social-Value Hiring Enhances Construction Projects

Why Cashflow Now Lives Inside the Programme Cashflow remains one of the defining determinants of contractor survival. Multiple studies identify poor cashflow forecasting and weak financial planning as major contributors to contractor insolvency—even on technically successful projects (Ejaz & Nawaz, 2020). As construction projects become more complex and financially constrained, researchers emphasise the need for integrating real project data into cashflow modelling rather tha